Skip to main content

Goldman Sachs

Former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, who serves as a senior policy advisor for Goldman Sachs, spoke to Bloomberg TV’s Erik Schatzker this morning on “Inside Track.” Levitt said that Goldman should stop saying, “The firm puts customers first.” He goes on to say, “There is a logical, reasonable, fair, understandable tension between a seller of a product and a buyer of a product. That’s not to stay that buyers should beware. It is to say there should be transparency. But on the other hand, let’s not create a fellowship of buyers and sellers that will march into the sunset.” Whoa!
Hello again, this does not sound like a bank, and this is the reason investment brokerages must be separated once more and for all from banking. An investment house sells products, that’s not to say the public should not have some protection in buying these products, but they are investment products and the buyer can choose to buy or not and the tension makes sense.
However, a bank has a fiduciary responsibility to its depositors and customers that transcends the free market. The bank has a duty of safety for both the bank and the customer.

“A bank’s fiduciary duty, whenever it is applied, sets a very high standard of conduct for the bank. It is obliged to act with integrity and fairness. It must also act with professionalism and skill. However, beyond that, fiduciary duty is underpinned by a duty to exercise the power vested in the bank, without abusing it. The key words are loyalty and fidelity. A bank “as a fiduciary” is required to perform its duties solely for the purpose for which the power was vested in it, without ulterior motives and while protecting the interest of the beneficiary – the customer. Moreover, a bank must prefer the interest of its customer to the interests of others, including its own self-interest; in fact, a bank must avoid being in a situation of a conflict of interest. The fear is that a bank might not withstand temptation and might not promptly guard the interest of the customer before its own interest.” ROLF H. WEBER University of Zurich


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Inflation

Many retail investors buy individual stocks with growing confidence in a narket that has a long run. Many fail to appreciate the way the market reflects inflation. Company revenue consists of inflated number,s as does cost and profit, thus the market reflects true inflation which must now be near 100%.
Post a Comment
Read more

Rick Atkinson

THE FATE OF THE DAY , just released, The war for America QUOTE George Washington. Our conflict is not likely to cease so soon as every good man would wish....Our cause is noble. it is the cause of mankind, and the danger to it springs from ourselves. March 31, 1779
Post a Comment
Read more

Tariffs versus Capital Surplus

"Trump is Completely Wrong on the Trade Deficit." Let Levin, Sowell, and Friedman Explain. In this interview, Melton Friedman claimed that "deficits are not bad. What's not to like about a capital surplus." In his book Arguing with Zombies, Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize economist, said, "An end to trade deficits? That's not something trade policy can or should do." The surplus profit earned through cheap foreign labor seeks the most profitable place to go. As the safest and most profitable option, that capital surplus lands in the US stock market. What's not to like about a capital surplus? That fondness intensifies with any threat of it going away, but why would tariffs be such a threat? Scott Bassett, US Secretary of the Treasury, on CNBC's Squawk Box, 4/8/25, said, "If we put up a tariff wall, the ultimate goal would be to bring manufacturing and jobs back to the US. In the meantime, we will be collecting substantial tariffs. As I...
Post a Comment
Read more