Hughesair (Inflection Point)

Retired physician and air taxi operator, science writer and part time assistant professor, these editorials cover a wide range of topics. Mostly non political, mostly true, I write more from experience than from research and more from science than convention. Subjects cover medicine, Alaska aviation, economics, technology and an occasional book review. The Floatplane book is out there. I am currently working on Hippocrates a History of Medicine and Globalism. Enjoy!

My Photo
Name:
Location: Homer, Alaska, United States

Alaska Floatplane: AVAILABLE ON KINDLE

Sunday, January 03, 2021

Interesting, why not say sooner?

RE: A Brain Surgeon's Perspective on Biden's Neuro Medical Status

For those of you who are worried about patient confidentiality, Biden disclosed the aneurysms in a report he filed before announcing his run for the Presidency.

BIDEN NEURO MEDICAL STATUS.....A PERSPECTIVE FROM A BRAIN SURGEON

First of all, I have had enough of the mainstream media! While I do not consider myself a political person, I am a practicing neurosurgeon with a background in cerebrovascular surgery, and I must scream "Foul!" on the media and here avenge the late Paul Harvey with 'the rest of the story' hidden from the American public!

How many of you know that Joe Biden has had 2 brain surgeries, one on each side of his head?

How many people know that Joe had a head full of blood after an aneurysm exploded in his head in 1988?

How many know that the resulting brain damage from a subarachnoid hemorrhage, as the blood breakdown products bathe the brain, are significant and permanent damage, let alone the compression and damage due to the jet of blood from the rupture itself.

Why has the media not asked for his medical records, list of medications, EEG, or at least an angiogram of his brain's blood vessels? Multi-aneurysm patients like Mr. Biden have a tendency to form new ones and are recommended to have an angiogram every 5 years; where is the report? Really, the NY Times couldn't do a piece on this? How about a CT scan to document what his brain looks like or verify he does not have hydrocephalus or a ventricular peritoneal shunt or seizure disorder? Where is the outrage?

The fact of the matter is the media conspiracy to elect Mr. Biden is unbelievable and wholly liable if he gets into office, while overlooking these significant medical issues. I mean, really, shouldn't there be some sort of medical prerequisite for the office and all of the stress it induces?
 Are we that desperate to install the first black female president? Shouldn't the first black female president be duly elected on her own merits rather than hiding behind a 77 year old sub-arachnoid hemorrhage survivor?

Love him or hate him, you do have to admire Mr. Biden for overcoming all these issues in the last 38 years but this disqualifies him in my eyes to hold the nuclear codes. Hell, in most states, he couldn't even get a driver’s license without a letter from a neurologist saying he was seizure free for a year.

Instead, we have almost elected him the leader of the free world and the keeper of the launch codes with no one knowing the truth, no one asking any health questions! Especially when he can’t remember who he is running against or who his wife is. Really, these are our choices: a subarachnoid hemorrhage survivor or a narcissist?

Whether you are for Biden or against him, please be honest enough to spread the truth about his medical issues before he's sworn in as our next president with no one knowing the medical issues he suffers from.

John R Robinson M.D. Neurosurgeon
West Palm Beach, Fl


Saturday, January 02, 2021

Unrestricted Warfare

A must read. Most of the election may be valid along with the outcome as many claim, but the smoke looks overwhelming. Like the flu, the odds of getting it are remote, but the consequences if you do get it can be sever.

Subversion, another invisible enemy, if present, threatens as well. We might better investigate the extent of China’s payments and benefits to American citizens. Follow the money! Look for the hacking! And read the extent of the PLA’s plans. If you still believe in American history and democracy, take a couple of turns and check your 6. It may be later than you think.

https://a.co/57x1xvd

Friday, January 01, 2021

Globalization or Democracy

 You can have Globalization or you can have Democracy, a Republic, but you cannot have both.why not read for free, 3 days left. Review it if you like. Contains enough documentation to piss off both sides. That should give me an intended audience of nearly everybody, but it also means nearly everybody will find enough to hate the book and not buy it. I was never much of a salesman. Oh well. “We’ll see what happens.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08L78TTGZ


 

Monday, December 28, 2020

Chapter 18 Fang Fang, Bang Bang

 About sums up the 2020 election, we’ll see what happens, another chapter.

Hear the People Sing

 You would have to ignore all the history and literature of the West not to realize that we are in the end game of communist subversion, and attempted takeover. First, decades of demoralization with idealogical subversion and brainwashing directed once by Russia and now, far more effectively, by China rejecting American institutions and values. Second, a decade of destabilization, with infiltration and massive recruitment of US leaders in all branches of government, infrastructure, education. news-media, even military and religion sowing chaos where ever possible. Thirdly, a crisis with rioting, looting and burning and promoting racism and, “defund the police.” And now, hacking of our election, censorship, threat of gun confiscation and a further widespread hacking attack against critical US defense entities, possibly done in such a way as to promote a false conflict with Russia. And now, fourthly, the Great Reset, communist normalization, a dialectic lead the CCP behind the scenes, by bonnie Prince Charles and condoned by our elected but not yet confirmed new government.

NB. Russia may or not be complicit in the hacking, Russia apparently continued its idealogical subversion, but there is every reason to split Russia away from China in order to achieve a balance of power.. Furthermore, China pines for the minerals, oil, timber and agricultural space along Russia’s 2516 mile vulnerable border with China, not to mention control of the gateway to Arctic shipping lanes. Alaska may be vulnerable too for the same reason — Big and Little Diomede, the shipping choke point to the Arctic Ocean.


Sectoral Balances

Sectoral balance macroeconomic equation, Godley & Cripps

 

Where S represents demand side savings

m:  imports

x: exports

I: supply side investments

g: government spending

t: treasury revenue

 

Trade deficit (m-x), stock market investment (I) in Chinese corporations, shadow banking and immigrat transfer of earnings back to families left behind all lead to a drain on liquidity and wealth away from internal American markets, demand side wealth and liquidity. While this loss imposes an every day sad reality to working America a growing wealthy class of international elites living on the supply side of the equation prospers in blissful denial. As direct beneficiaries of globalization the globalist elite look the other way.

 

A graphic representation of Capital displacement and its consequences might suggest:

 

Globalization                                       leads to                        Capital divergence

Democracy                                          devolves into               Oligarchy

Freedom                                              gives way to                 Idealogical subversion

Internationalism                                   evolves into                  Communism

Equality                                                turns into                      Dystopia         

Middle/Working class                           Looses to.                    Cheap foreign labor

US Manufacturing might                       Underwrites                 Chinese growth and military 



Tuesday, December 22, 2020

Point of Care Genomic Correlation, the Future



The 23andMe+ Pharmacogenetics Portal, a new resource for healthcare providers - provides point-of-care information based on various test results. Pharmacogenetics reports include: CYP2C19 Drug Metabolism, DPYD Drug Metabolism, and SLCO1B1 Drug Transport. The results are only available for 23andMe+ members, however, that database is growing. Reassuringly, the genomic data-base belongs to the patient so long as the patient wishes to keep it so.

Thursday, December 17, 2020

The magic Hand

 Many refer to Adam Smith’s “magic hand” as an excuse for greed. In his book Wealth of Nations, Smith favored free trade, division of labor and manufacturing as well as the self regulation of self interest. However, Smith cautioned against the potential harm to labor as early as the third sentence of his book and extensively so in his last revision. Most economists in support of our laissez-faire classical economics, have not actually read or understood Adam Smith; it is difficult reading. Smith was horrified by the poverty and capital divergence from the industrial revolution. Smith was a moral philosopher. His later book, Theory of Moral Sentiments, drives home the problems with wealth transfer and poverty resulting from the very thing we did with globalization. 

America’s success with freedom and our own style of laissez-faire capitalism succeeded wildly largely due to seemingly unlimited land and a strong Jewdeo-Christian moral and work ethic. Dispute the evils of slavery, some banking barons, exploitation of labor and a Great Depression, we had freedom and a moral guidepost, but not anymore.

Seventy years of Cold War, and communist subversion, lead us step by step to accept tenets of the Communist Manifesto: no religion, no marriage and a rejection of property, profit, nationalism and freedom. 

Yes, we have problems with greed, oligarchs and poverty, even over population, but as with most problems, education offers the greatest marginal return, not ideological subversion as in the past, but moral sentiment, citizenship, history and science. Put the Ten Commandments, or the Eleven Fold Path, even AA’s twelve steps for that matter, on the schoolhouse and courthouse steps. According to some, it will take 20 years to purge a new generation of the communist brainwashing and restore a moral perpetuity, a containment of greed and a spirit of cooperation.


Monday, December 14, 2020

Early treatment COVID19?

"patients (median age, 62), with COVID-19 pneumonia and with symptom onset averaging about 1 week prior to enrollment, received either convalescent plasma or placebo." Allan S. Brett, MD and Helmut Albrecht, MD reviewing 

Another negative study for convalescent serum for COVID19 raises the question, what are they trying to prove? If the use of convalescent serum in preventing pneumonia and death in the double blind study only starts with the onset of hospitalized pneumonia, then it seems unlikely that any agent in question would prevent pneumonia, and if 83% of hospitalized COVID19  pneumonia patients die, then it would seem unlikely that the use of a preventative modality at this late stage would have much benefit. The changes in the lungs with COVID19 pneumonia go far beyond infection. The damage is hard to reverse. Steroids appear to mitigate some of the damage, but  when the CAT scan shows massive pneumonia, it may be too late.

Even these double blind studies need to be viewed with skepticism. In an out of control epidemic, the first-hand experience of front line physicians may be a better guideline for treatment, ivermectin for instance and early treatment. Early treatment requires distribution of testing and treatment products to primary care physicians. By the time a patient experiences shortness of breath and hospitalization, the opportunity for early treatment is passed. President Trump's experience with early treatment is a case in point.

acknowledgment: I am not a frontline physician, but comment from the perspective of retirement and age related experience.

Thursday, December 10, 2020

Globalization

 Organizers of trade and foreign policy that served America well initially, grew into to a shadow government, more international than constitutional or democratic. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a nonprofit think tank, incorporated July 1921, publishes the bimonthly journal Foreign Policy. With 4,900 members, including practically all of the past bureaucracy, the so-called deep state, and an annual revenue of 101 million, CcFR’s publications provide a virtual roadmap to US foreign policy. While much of CFR’s direction has been positive, one must acknowledge that much of our foreign policy emanates from an unelected intellectual elite that, in practice, orchestrated US strategy, publishing in Foreign Policy, thus making transparent—and predictable—any subsequent US actions. When it comes to foreign policy, transparency is not a virtue. 

Reaching far beyond the CFR, David Rockefeller, who was president of the CFR at that time, organized the initial meeting of the Trilateral Commission (TC) in 1973. The initial organizers were Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Jimmy Carter, meeting to discuss global concerns and cooperation at a time when the European Union had already achieved many of these goals. The US sought cooperation between Europe, South America, Japan, and Asia, as well as securing cheap oil imports from the Middle East. The TC soon expanded to include European and Asian leaders as well as Canadian and South American. 

Members of the Trilateral Commission, now often called TriComs, included virtually the entire cabinet of all subsequent administrations until the present. Familiar names include James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, George Shultz, Cyrus Vance, Alexander Haig, Henry Kissinger, Warren Christopher, and Harold Brown. Every administration, including President Obama’s and President Obama himself, contributed to a philosophy of discouraging nationalism to foster business, banking, and government cooperation between Europe, North America, and Asia. 

The TC allocates its 400-member votes as follows: 20 Canada; 13 Mexico; 87 US; 20 Germany; 18 for France, Italy, and the UK; 12 for Spain; and 1-6 for the rest of Europe, totaling 170 members. For Asia’s 117 members: 75 Japan; 11 South Korea; 7 Australia and New Zealand; 9 for China, Hong Kong, Taiwan; and 15 for South east Asia including Thailand. Thus, the US holds about a 21% voice in an international organization whose policies strongly influenced virtually every administration from 1973 until the present (major cause of the bureaucratic sedition against the present administration—opinion). 

During President Carter’s presidential campaign in 1976, and his presidency, news media and opponents paid little attention to the influence of the TC. Former members of the commission made up virtually all the top positions in Carter’s administration: vice-president, secretary of state, treasury, national security advisor, defense, and many others. Members were required to resign from the TC prior to assuming government office. This association held true for every administration, Democratic or Republican, up to and including the Obama administration. 

These unelected members of a shadow government, guided by international majority interests, constituted the decision-making backbone of every US administration, the left enamored by a sense of idealism and rejection of American institutions—a sentiment from the anti-Vietnam era—and the right by the advantages to international banking, cheap labor, profit, and “the new world order.”

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

The Great Reset, Globalism and the Communist Manifesto

 Be careful what you wish for. The Great Silk Road, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four, The Great Reset and Communism have a lot in common.

Carl Marks and Friedrich Engles’ Communist Manifesto lists ten maxims that may sound familiar .

1 Abolish all property rights

2  Increase progressive taxes 

3. Eliminate all inheritance 

4. Confiscate property & terminate all emigrants and rebels

5. State owned banking monopoly

6. Federalize all communication and transportation 

7. Federalize all factories, farms and means of production

8. All persons (except the chosen) liable for labor and subscription 

9. Depopulate cities in favor of more equal distribution of population

10  Universal State run education, indoctrination, elimination of marriage and religion

All of this in a progressive series of political resets, described as dialectic materialism. Each new political subversion or thesis meets resistance or anthesis but results in a compromise with traditional values. The synthesis in a stepwise manner further undermines individual liberty, property and democracy leading inexcusably to international communism. 

The new world order, not by or for the people, serves the international elite. Not so odd that Bonny Prince Charles champions the great reset, surely just another dialectic on the way to the new commonform, globalism and a dystopian tyranny, by an elite that will later be cast aside by yet another communist subversion.

 

Tuesday, December 01, 2020

Smartmatic Software

 This is not a conspiracy theory, it is pure conjecture. Suppose as some claim, our voting software is programmed to secretly alter votes just enough for elected leaders to stay in office or win over a less connected opponent. Would it be a biding war or a hacking war, and who owned the server. This much is true, the Dominion System takes in the original ballots, tabulates them, then prints a hard copy, so the recount should always match the tally. You would have to look at signatures in ballot boxes. What is also true, such vote-manipulating software does exist.

Has the alleged subversive vote altering system been in use in US elections for decades as an insurance policy for individuals to win or stay in office? Would such an election subversion not account for legislators staying in office, seemingly for life? Does a foreign entity control the server or was it taken over by the CIA during the Clinton, Bush or Obama era. Did candidates at onetime pay for election insurance? Is Smartmatic now controlled by political interests, the CIA or was it hacked by foreign operatives? 

Intriguingly, was Hillary Clinton programmed to win in 2016, only to be over hacked  by Russia resulting in a Trump win? Did China hack this one? Were there three hands in the cookie jar, the Democrats, the Chinese and Russia accounting for the apparent attempt to reset the data in the middle of the night.

Were the machines online in short bursts with a nefarious server in Germany? Was the software pre programmed? Did subversive characters use thumb drives to alter the count? Why did the CIA operate a server that may have had something to do with the election, and why a raid on CIA offices in Germany by US military. Who has the server now and where is the smoking hard drive? How many people have too much to hide, and why a near total news blackout from the MSM while the alternative news and Australia are all over the saga?

However this turns out, we must make sure computers, software, the internet, 5G, brainwashing and thumb drives have nothing to do with future elections. In the brave new world, it’s all about mind control from the top down. In Democracy, it’s all about individual citizens controlling honestly elected officials. 

Globalization or Democracy  you can’t have both