Skip to main content

Cheap Chinese Goods, the Fallacy

 Intuitively we think that cheaper imports from China benefits the American people. In reality, the purchase of imported goods, removes the production, the employment and the economic velocity from our economy with far more negative consequences. 

Follow the money. A macroeconomic equation by Godley and Cripps best shows the liquidity flow, not so obvious on the surface.

S + (m-x) = I + (g-t)

S = middle class savings, m= imports, x= exports, I= investments, g= government spending and t= treasury revenue. Investments may be in China, in multinationals or international banking. Some of it amounts to retirement funds underwriting the Chinese companies and military.

As you can see, a trade deficit (m-x) must result in some combination of: decreased savings, increased investments, decreased treasury revenue or increased government spending, all of which comes out of the private sector of productivity market turnover (velocity) middle class wealth and consumer spending.

If you ask why? —- GDP = velocity x money supply, where in money turns over some times between 1 and 15 (velocity) while money supply amounts to trillions  only a small decrease in velocity reduces the GDP by a large percentage. Furthermore, that effect falls on the consumer far more than on the wealthy.

One can further see from that liquidity flow, a greater and greater concentration of wealth in the hands, the banks and the investments of the wealthy, a phenomena economists call capital divergence.  

Capital divergence correlates with: the long term cycle of depression, with war, famine and the collapse of civilizations.

So, cheap Chinese goods may not be so cheap after all  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Election 2024

The November 2024 election presents a significant challenge, transcending the traditional Democrat versus Republican divide. This election will determine the future of the American Republic, Western civilization, and potentially the survival of the human species. Plato suggested that democracies tend to devolve into oligarchies, and we are witnessing that transformation before our eyes. Three major trends in the U.S. threaten to replace our Constitution and representative government with a totalitarian, internationalist, socialistic oligarchy. First, seventy years of Soviet subversion, the Vietnam War, and generations of youth who were taught to reject American institutions have undermined U.S. leadership. Now, Chinese espionage, bribery, and infiltration further contribute to the erosion of America’s traditions of citizenship, enterprise, and prosperity. Second, NGOs in Washington, an entrenched bureaucracy, and organizations like the Trilateral Commission prioritize internation...

Inflation

Many retail investors buy individual stocks with growing confidence in a narket that has a long run. Many fail to appreciate the way the market reflects inflation. Company revenue consists of inflated number,s as does cost and profit, thus the market reflects true inflation which must now be near 100%.

Tariffs versus Capital Surplus

"Trump is Completely Wrong on the Trade Deficit." Let Levin, Sowell, and Friedman Explain. In this interview, Melton Friedman claimed that "deficits are not bad. What's not to like about a capital surplus." In his book Arguing with Zombies, Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize economist, said, "An end to trade deficits? That's not something trade policy can or should do." The surplus profit earned through cheap foreign labor seeks the most profitable place to go. As the safest and most profitable option, that capital surplus lands in the US stock market. What's not to like about a capital surplus? That fondness intensifies with any threat of it going away, but why would tariffs be such a threat? Scott Bassett, US Secretary of the Treasury, on CNBC's Squawk Box, 4/8/25, said, "If we put up a tariff wall, the ultimate goal would be to bring manufacturing and jobs back to the US. In the meantime, we will be collecting substantial tariffs. As I...